The Los Angeles Kings have made a notable move by recalling forward Samuel Helenius from their AHL affiliate, the Ontario Reign. This decision comes as the team struggles through a four-game losing streak, during which they have been outmuscled and physically dominated in most contests. Helenius, standing at an imposing 6’6″, brings a much-needed physical presence to the lineup, even if his offensive contributions have been limited this season. With just three points (one goal) and a -2 rating, his impact on the scoreboard won’t be substantial, but his 80 hits—averaging nearly three per game—indicate that he can help the Kings avoid being pushed around on the ice. Helenius’ role is clear: he’s not here to ignite the team’s struggling offense but to bring a level of toughness and physicality that has been missing.
This move raises questions about the role of another physical forward, Tanner Jeannot, who has been with the Kings this season. Jeannot, like Helenius, is known for his rugged style of play, but he also possesses better offensive instincts. Despite this, Jeannot has struggled mightily, going 20 games without a goal and posting just one assist with a -8 rating. His recent performance has been a letdown, which might explain why the Kings opted to bring up Helenius instead of relying on Jeannot to fill the enforcer role. However, it’s possible that the team values Jeannot’s experience and scoring potential over Helenius’ raw physicality. The situation leaves fans wondering if Jeannot’s role will diminish or if the two will coexist in the lineup.
The recall of Helenius also brings into focus the ongoing debate about Trevor Lewis’ place in the lineup. Lewis, a veteran forward, has seen his on-ice performance decline significantly in recent years, yet he continues to dress for games. Once a versatile player who could slot into various roles, including short stints on the top line under former coach Darryl Sutter, Lewis now struggles to make an impact. His metrics and effectiveness have waned, but the Kings seem unwilling to scratch him from the lineup. This decision has puzzled fans, who see younger, more dynamic players like Brandt Clarke being scratched despite their higher upside.
Speaking of Clarke, the young defenseman has been a subject of frustration for fans this season. After a strong start, Clarke’s production dropped off sharply, and his playing time has been reduced, particularly since Drew Doughty returned to full health. While Clarke has shown flashes of offensive brilliance, his defensive inconsistencies have made it difficult for the coaching staff to trust him in critical moments. The team’s decision to scratch him in favor of more established players like Helenius and Lewis has led to vocal criticism from fans, who believe Clarke’s potential outweighs his current mistakes.
Helenius’ addition to the lineup appears to be an effort to shore up the bottom six and instill a more aggressive mindset. While he lacks the hockey IQ or skill to drive play, his physicality and willingness to engage in battles could help the Kings establish a more formidable identity. By adding Helenius, the Kings are signaling that they won’t be bullied on the ice, a message that resonates with fans who’ve grown tired of watching their team get outmuscled. However, this move also highlights the team’s reluctance to embrace younger, more dynamic players like Clarke, who could bring much-needed energy and creativity to a lineup that’s struggled to find consistency.
Ultimately, the decision to recall Helenius and stick with Lewis while scratching Clarke reflects the Kings’ current philosophy: prioritize experience and physicality over youthful potential. While this approach might help the team navigate the challenges of the season, it also risks alienating fans who are eager to see the next generation of players take on bigger roles. As the Kings continue to navigate their struggles, the balance between toughness and skill will remain a key issue for the franchise moving forward.
